Differential gene expression profiles are dependent upon method of peripheral blood collection and RNA isolation
Open Access
- 10 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Genomics
- Vol. 9 (1), 474
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-474
Abstract
Background: RNA isolation and purification steps greatly influence the results of gene expression profiling. There are two commercially available products for whole blood RNA collection, PAXgene™ and Tempus™ blood collection tubes, and each comes with their own RNA purification method. In both systems the blood is immediately lysed when collected into the tube and RNA stabilized using proprietary reagents. Both systems enable minimal blood handling procedures thus minimizing the risk of inducing changes in gene expression through blood handling or processing. Because the RNA purification steps could influence the total RNA pool, we examined the impact of RNA isolation, using the PAXgene™ or Tempus™ method, on gene expression profiles. Results: Using microarrays as readout of RNA from stimulated whole blood we found a common set of expressed transcripts in RNA samples from either PAXgene™ or Tempus™. However, we also found several to be uniquely expressed depending on the type of collection tube, suggesting that RNA purification methods impact results of differential gene expression profiling. Specifically, transcripts for several known PHA-inducible genes, including IFNγ, IL13, IL2, IL3, and IL4 were found to be upregulated in stimulated vs. control samples when RNA was isolated using the ABI Tempus™ method, but not using the PAXgene™ method (p < 0.01, FDR corrected). Sequenom Quantiative Gene Expression (QGE) (SanDiego, CA) measures confirmed IL2, IL4 and IFNγ up-regulation in Tempus™ purified RNA from PHA stimulated cells while only IL2 was up-regulated using PAXgene™ purified (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Here, we demonstrate that peripheral blood RNA isolation methods can critically impact differential expression results, particularly in the clinical setting where fold-change differences are typically small and there is inherent variability within biological cohorts. A modified method based upon the Tempus™ system was found to provide high yield, good post-hybridization array quality, low variability in expression measures and was shown to produce differential expression results consistent with the predicted immunologic effects of PHA stimulation.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development and evaluation of real competitive PCR for high-throughput quantitative applicationsAnalytical Biochemistry, 2005
- RETRACTED: Gene expression profiling using RNA extracted from whole blood: technologies and clinical applicationsExpert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 2005
- Whole blood and leukocyte RNA isolation for gene expression analysesPhysiological Genomics, 2004
- Mining Disease Susceptibility Genes through SNP Analyses and Expression Profiling Using MALDI-TOF Mass SpectrometryJournal of Proteome Research, 2004
- Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformaticsGenome Biology, 2004
- Chipping away at the chip bias: RNA degradation in microarray analysisNature Genetics, 2003
- Assessment of two methods for handling blood in collection tubes with RNA stabilizing agent for surveillance of gene expression profiles with high density microarraysJournal of Immunological Methods, 2003
- A high-throughput gene expression analysis technique using competitive PCR and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight MSProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003
- Improvement of molecular monitoring of residual disease in leukemias by bedside RNA stabilizationLeukemia, 2002
- RT-PCR splicing analysis of the NF1 open reading frameHuman Genetics, 2002