An Aesthetic Theory of Conflict in Administrative Ethics
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Administration & Society
- Vol. 38 (1), 113-134
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399705284206
Abstract
Normally, one would think of conflict in administrative ethics as something to be avoided or resolved. This article, however, explores the possibility that conflict in ethics is essential and productive. Great art is beautiful precisely because of tension, not in spite of it, and the authors argue that administrative ethics is more like art than science. Therefore, the authors adopt an aesthetic point of view that examines tension and balance and reveals a wide range of types of conflict in ethics. In fact, the authors articulate 15 types of conflict and argue that the recognition of conflict is necessary for its proper management.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Publics” Administration and the Ethics of ParticularityPublic Administration Review, 2003
- Productivity and the Moral ManagerAdministration & Society, 2002
- Law versus EthicsAdministration & Society, 1998
- Through the Ethical Looking Glass DarklyAdministration & Society, 1995
- Public Service and Private Hospitality: A Case Study in Federal Conflict-of-Interest ReformPublic Administration Review, 1992
- Integrity in the Public ServicePublic Administration Review, 1990
- A Partnership in Virtue among All Citizens: The Public Service and Civic HumanismPublic Administration Review, 1989
- Individualism, Civic Virtue, and Public AdministrationAdministration & Society, 1988
- Hierarchy, Virtue, and the Practice of Public Administration: A Perspective for Normative EthicsPublic Administration Review, 1987
- The Public Service and the Patriotism of BenevolencePublic Administration Review, 1985