Differences in fat-related dietary patterns between black, Hispanic and white women: results from the Women's Health Trial Feasibility Study in Minority Populations
Open Access
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Public Health Nutrition
- Vol. 2 (3), 253-262
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980099000348
Abstract
Objective: This report examines how sources of fat and patterns of fat-related dietary habits differed between black, Hispanic and white women participating in a randomized trial of a low-fat diet intervention.Design: The intervention consisted of group sessions, which met weekly for 6 weeks, biweekly for 6 weeks and monthly for 9 months, and included didactic nutrition education and activities to provide motivation for sustained dietary change. Outcomes included total fat and fat from nine food groups from a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and a summary scale and five subscales that measure fat-related dietary habits.Setting/subjects: Data are from 1702 post-menopausal women, recruited from clinical centres in Atlanta, Birmingham and Miami, with dietary assessments at baseline and 6 months post-randomization.Results: Total fat intake was similar across race/ethnic groups at baseline, yet there were many differences in sources of fat and fat-related dietary habits. For example, blacks consumed less fat from dairy foods and more fat from meats than whites. Effects of the intervention on total fat intake or the summary fat-related dietary habits scale did not differ across race/ethnicity groups. There were, however, many differences in how the intervention affected sources of fat and fat-related dietary habits. For example, the intervention effect for added fats (e.g. butter and salad dressings) was −8.9 g for blacks and −12.0 g for whites (P< 0.05). The intervention effect for adopting low-fat meat purchasing and preparation methods was larger for blacks than whites, and the intervention effect for replacing high-fat foods with fruits and vegetables was larger for Hispanics than whites.Conclusions: This study demonstrates that, if properly designed, a single nutrition intervention programme can work well even in groups with culturally diverse dietary patterns.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Associations of Race/Ethnicity, Education, and Dietary Intervention with the Validity and Reliability of a Food Frequency Questionnaire: The Women's Health Trial Feasibility Study in Minority PopulationsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- A dietary intervention in primary care practice: the Eating Patterns Study.American Journal of Public Health, 1997
- Using a brief household food inventory as an environmental indicator of individual dietary practices.American Journal of Public Health, 1997
- The Women's Health Trial Feasibility Study in Minority Populations: Design and baseline descriptionsAnnals of Epidemiology, 1996
- Low-Fat Diet Practices of Older Women: Prevalence and Implications for Dietary AssessmentJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 1996
- Macronutrient intakes among adult Hispanics: a comparison of Mexican Americans, Cuban Americans, and mainland Puerto Ricans.American Journal of Public Health, 1995
- The Working Well Trial: Baseline Dietary and Smoking Behaviors of Employees and Related Worksite CharacteristicsPreventive Medicine, 1995
- Food choices of whites, blacks, and Hispanics: Data from the 1987 national health interview surveyNutrition and Cancer, 1995
- Assessing change in diet-intervention researchThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1994
- Feasibility of a randomized trial of a low-fat diet for the prevention of breast cancer: Dietary compliance in the women's health trial vanguard studyPreventive Medicine, 1990