Are you better? A multi‐centre study of patient‐defined recovery from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Open Access
- 1 December 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Pain Supplements
- Vol. 22 (3), 551-564
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1138
Abstract
Background Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) symptoms can significantly differ between patients, fluctuate over time, disappear or persist. This leads to problems in defining recovery and in evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. Objectives To define recovery from the patients’ perspective and better understand their priorities for treatment approaches. Methods Establishing an international consortium, we used a 2‐Round Delphi‐based study in eight countries across Europe and North America. Participants ≥18 years who met, or had met, Budapest clinical criteria were included. Round 1 participants completed the statement: ‘I would/do consider myself recovered from CRPS if/because…’ alongside demographic and health questionnaires. Data were thematically organised and represented as 62 statements, from which participants identified and ranked their recovery priorities in Round 2. Results Round 1 (N = 347, 80% female, 91% non‐recovered) dominant ICF themes were: activities of daily living; bodily functions; external factors; participation and personal factors. The top five priority statements in Round 2 (N = 252) were: no longer having (1) CRPS‐related pain, (2) generalised pain and discomfort, (3) restricted range of movement, (4) need for medication, (5) stiffness in the affected limb. With very few exceptions, priorities were consistent, irrespective of patient demographics/geography. Symptoms affecting daily activities were among those most frequently reported. Conclusions Our data showed a small number of themes are of highest importance to CRPS patients’ definition of recovery. Patients want their pain, movement restriction and reliance on medication to be addressed, above all other factors. These factors should therefore be foremost concerns for future treatment and rehabilitation programmes. Significance Those with longstanding CRPS may no longer meet diagnostic criteria but still be symptomatic. Defining recovery is therefore problematic in CRPS. Our study has identified patients’ definition of recovery from CRPS, in order of priority, as relief from: their CRPS‐related pain, generalised pain, movement restriction, reliance on medication, and stiffness.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute for Health Research (CDF/2009/02/)
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the “Budapest Criteria”) for Complex Regional Pain SyndromePain, 2010
- Translating the Dutch Walking Stairs, Walking Ability and Rising and Sitting Questionnaires into German and assessing their concurrent validity with VAS measures of pain and activities in daily livingBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2010
- German translation and external validation of the Radboud Skills Questionnaire in patients suffering from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 1BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2010
- Outcome of the Complex Regional Pain SyndromeThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 2009
- A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Survey of Complex Regional Pain SyndromeRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2009
- Complex regional pain syndrome 1 – the Swiss cohort studyBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2008
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomesBehaviour Research and Therapy, 2006
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative researchBMJ, 2000
- The Radboud skills questionnaire: construction and reliability in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy of one upper extremityDisability and Rehabilitation, 2000