History and Evaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
- Vol. 129 (1), 53-63
- https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(2003)129:1(53)
Abstract
A brief history of development of the 1985 Hargreaves equation and its comparison to evapotranspiration (ET) predicted by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Penman-Monteith method are described to provide background and information helpful in selecting an appropriate reference ET equation under various data situations. Early efforts in irrigation water requirement computations in California and other arid and semiarid regions required the development of simplified ET equations for use with limited weather data. Several initial efforts were directed towards improving the usefulness of pan evaporation for estimating irrigation water requirements. Similarity with climates of other countries allowed developments in California to be extended overseas. Criticism of empirical methods by H. L. Penman and others encouraged the search for a robust and practical method that was based on readily available climatic data for computing potential evapotranspiration or reference crop evapotranspiration One of these efforts ultimately culminated in the 1985 Hargreaves method. The 1985 Hargreaves method requires only measured temperature data, is simple, and appears to be less impacted than Penman-type methods when data are collected from arid or semiarid, nonirrigated sites. For irrigated sites, the Hargreaves 1985 method produces values for periods of five or more days that compare favorably with those of the FAO Penman-Monteith and California Irrigation Management Information Services (CIMIS) Penman methods. The Hargreaves predicted 0.97 of lysimeter measured at Kimberly, Idaho after adjustment of lysimeter data for differences in surface conductance from the FAO Penman-Monteith definition. Monthly by the 1985 Hargreaves equation compares closely with calculated using a simplified, “reduced-set” Penman-Monteith that requires air temperature data only.
Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simultaneous estimation of daily solar radiation and humidity from observed temperature and precipitation: an application over complex terrain in AustriaAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2000
- An improved method for estimating surface humidity from daily minimum temperatureAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1997
- Self-Calibrating Method for Estimating Solar Radiation from Air TemperatureJournal of Hydrologic Engineering, 1997
- Operational Estimates of Reference EvapotranspirationAgronomy Journal, 1989
- Estimating potential evapotranspiration: the effect of random and systematic errorsAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1989
- On the relationship between incoming solar radiation and daily maximum and minimum temperatureAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1984
- Weather Station Siting and Consumptive Use EstimatesJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 1983
- On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale ParametersMonthly Weather Review, 1972
- Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grassProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1948
- Solar and terrestrial radiation. Report to the international commission for solar research on actinometric investigations of solar and atmospheric radiationQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1924