Social class differences in infant mortality: the problem of competing hypotheses
- 1 October 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Biosocial Science
- Vol. 20 (4), 497-504
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021932000017624
Abstract
Summary There is no agreed explanation of the social class gradient in infant mortality. The longstanding debate continues between those who favour explanations based on natural or social selection and those who stress the influence of environmental circumstances. These explanations are often presented as competing hypotheses between which it is necessary to make an absolute choice. An article which takes this approach is critically examined. It is argued that such an approach may lead to erroneous conclusions, and may divert attention away from the primary task of understanding how to bring about further improvements in the survival of infants in the manual social classes.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Housing conditions and ill health.BMJ, 1987
- Social factors and disease: the medical perspective.BMJ, 1987
- Short, Black, Baird, Himsworth, and social class differences in fetal and neonatal mortality rates.BMJ, 1985
- Epidemiology, genetics and sociologyJournal of Biosocial Science, 1984
- IS ROUTINE ANTENATAL CARE WORTH WHILE?The Lancet, 1980
- THE INVERSE CARE LAWThe Lancet, 1971