Why Bother? Because Peer-to-Peer Programs Can Mobilize Young Voters
- 25 April 2006
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in PS: Political Science and Politics
- Vol. 39 (2), 341-345
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096506060550
Abstract
Many assume that young Americans are apathetic, self-absorbed, and indifferent to civic matters. It is a turned-off generation, we are told. But nothing could be further from the truth. A host of data suggests young Americans give their energy, time, and money to their schools, community, and nation. A recent report by the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), for example, suggests young Americans volunteer at higher rates than do older Americans (Lopez 2003). The frequency of pitching-in has also increased: In 1990 some 65% of college freshman reported volunteering in high school, and by 2003 that figure had risen to 83%. Rates of volunteer work for those under 25 are now twice as high as for those over 55. Perhaps this is the activist generation.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mobilizing the Party Faithful: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in MichiganSSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- Civic Education, Political Socialization, and Political Mobilization: Can “Kids Voting, USA” Diminish Inequalities in Voter Participation?Journal of Geography, 2001
- Service Learning in College Political Science: Queries and CommentaryPS: Political Science and Politics, 2000
- Peer Learning and AssessmentAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1999
- Where Is the Schema? Going Beyond the “S” Word in Political PsychologyAmerican Political Science Review, 1991
- Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-Analysis of FindingsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1982
- Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of FindingsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1982
- The Effect of Registration Laws on Voter TurnoutAmerican Political Science Review, 1978