Basketball Teams as Strategic Networks
Open Access
- 6 November 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (11), e47445
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047445
Abstract
We asked how team dynamics can be captured in relation to function by considering games in the first round of the NBA 2010 play-offs as networks. Defining players as nodes and ball movements as links, we analyzed the network properties of degree centrality, clustering, entropy and flow centrality across teams and positions, to characterize the game from a network perspective and to determine whether we can assess differences in team offensive strategy by their network properties. The compiled network structure across teams reflected a fundamental attribute of basketball strategy. They primarily showed a centralized ball distribution pattern with the point guard in a leadership role. However, individual play-off teams showed variation in their relative involvement of other players/positions in ball distribution, reflected quantitatively by differences in clustering and degree centrality. We also characterized two potential alternate offensive strategies by associated variation in network structure: (1) whether teams consistently moved the ball towards their shooting specialists, measured as “uphill/downhill” flux, and (2) whether they distributed the ball in a way that reduced predictability, measured as team entropy. These network metrics quantified different aspects of team strategy, with no single metric wholly predictive of success. However, in the context of the 2010 play-offs, the values of clustering (connectedness across players) and network entropy (unpredictability of ball movement) had the most consistent association with team advancement. Our analyses demonstrate the utility of network approaches in quantifying team strategy and show that testable hypotheses can be evaluated using this approach. These analyses also highlight the richness of basketball networks as a dataset for exploring the relationships between network structure and dynamics with team organization and effectiveness.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantifying the Performance of Individual Players in a Team ActivityPLOS ONE, 2010
- The Price of Anarchy in BasketballJournal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 2010
- Evolutionary perspectives on salary dispersion within firmsJournal of Bioeconomics, 2009
- Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performanceThe Leadership Quarterly, 2006
- A division of labour with role specialization in group-hunting bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) off Cedar Key, FloridaProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005
- The Structure and Function of Complex NetworksSiam Review, 2003
- Network Motifs: Simple Building Blocks of Complex NetworksScience, 2002
- Team leadershipThe Leadership Quarterly, 2001
- Teams in animal societiesBehavioral Ecology, 2001
- A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on BetweennessSociometry, 1977