Texture Features from Mammographic Images and Risk of Breast Cancer
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 18 (3), 837-845
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0631
Abstract
Mammographic percent density (PD) is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, but there has been relatively little systematic evaluation of other features in mammographic images that might additionally predict breast cancer risk. We evaluated the association of a large number of image texture features with risk of breast cancer using a clinic-based case-control study of digitized film mammograms, all with screening mammograms before breast cancer diagnosis. The sample was split into training (123 cases and 258 controls) and validation (123 cases and 264 controls) data sets. Age-adjusted and body mass index (BMI)–adjusted odds ratios (OR) per SD change in the feature, 95% confidence intervals, and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) were obtained using logistic regression. A bootstrap approach was used to identify the strongest features in the training data set, and results for features that validated in the second half of the sample were reported using the full data set. The mean age at mammography was 64.0 ± 10.2 years, and the mean time from mammography to breast cancer was 3.7 ± 1.0 (range, 2.0-5.9 years). PD was associated with breast cancer risk (OR, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.78). The strongest features that validated from each of several classes (Markovian, run length, Laws, wavelet, and Fourier) showed similar ORs as PD and predicted breast cancer at a similar magnitude (AUC = 0.58-0.60) as PD (AUC = 0.58). All of these features were automatically calculated (unlike PD) and measure texture at a coarse scale. These features were moderately correlated with PD (r = 0.39-0.76), and after adjustment for PD, each of the features attenuated only slightly and retained statistical significance. However, simultaneous inclusion of these features in a model with PD did not significantly improve the ability to predict breast cancer. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(3):837–45)Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mammographic Breast Density as a General Marker of Breast Cancer RiskCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2007
- Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysisCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2006
- Mammographic Features and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluations in the Guernsey Prospective StudiesCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2005
- Limitations of the Odds Ratio in Gauging the Performance of a Diagnostic, Prognostic, or Screening MarkerAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic imagesEuropean Journal Of Cancer Prevention, 1996
- A representation for mammographic image processingMedical Image Analysis, 1996
- Quantitative Classification of Mammographic Densities and Breast Cancer Risk: Results From the Canadian National Breast Screening StudyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1995
- Improving the Distinction Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: The Value of Sonographic Texture AnalysisUltrasonic Imaging, 1993
- Feasibility of identifying amyloid and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with the use of computerized quantitative texture analysis of clinical echocardiographic dataJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Markovian analysis of cervical cell images.Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, 1976