An Evaluation of Two Strategies for Reducing Adverse Impact and Their Effects on Criterion-Related Validity
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Human Performance
- Vol. 9 (3), 241-258
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0903_4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN INTERVIEWER RATINGS: THE IMPACT OF STANDARDIZATION, CONSENSUS DISCUSSION, AND SAMPLING ERROR ON THE VALIDITY OF A STRUCTURED INTERVIEWPersonnel Psychology, 1996
- EXPERIENCE‐BASED AND SITUATIONAL INTERVIEW QUESTIONS: STUDIES OF VALIDITYPersonnel Psychology, 1995
- Predicting pilot and navigator criteria: Not much more than g.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994
- The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994
- The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 1993
- THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 1991
- PROJECT A VALIDITY RESULTS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREDICTOR AND CRITERION DOMAINSPersonnel Psychology, 1990
- Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990
- An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990
- Examination of race and sex effects on performance ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989