Extracting information from hospital records: what patients think about consent
Open Access
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Vol. 16 (6), 404-408
- https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.020313
Abstract
Background and objective: There is increasing regulation and concern about the use of material from patients’ records. Studies on patients’ views have focused on primary care and on use of material for research. This study investigated patients’ preferences about whether and how doctors should seek permission for use of specified items of anonymised information from their hospital records for clinical audit, teaching, national data collection and research. Method: A specially designed questionnaire sent to recently discharged patients under the care of medical and surgical specialists. Results: 166/316 (53%) patients completed the questionnaires. The percentage of respondents who “definitely wanted” or “preferred” to be asked for permission for use of anonymised information was highest for medical history (21%) and reasons for treatment (20%). The purpose for which information was requested (eg, research, audit) made little difference to the overall percentages (range 10–12%). 21 (13%) patients “definitely wanted” to be asked for permission for use of some item or proposed use of information—most had no preference or preferred not to be asked. The most popular method for asking permission was signing a form while in hospital, rather than by specific requests later. Conclusions: Most hospital patients have no preference or prefer not to be asked permission for doctors to use information from their records. About 1 in 8 patients would like to be asked for permission, some even for clinical audit of outcomes—although a minority, this could compromise thorough clinical audit. Systems for obtaining permission when patients are admitted to hospital need to be considered. Resolution of uncertainties surrounding legislation on the use of information would be helpful to clinicians.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients, privacy and trust: Patients’ willingness to allow researchers to access their medical recordsSocial Science & Medicine, 2006
- Patients’ attitudes towards sharing their health informationInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2006
- Spain's high rate of organ donation may hinge on local useBMJ, 2006
- National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer RegistryBMJ, 2006
- A feasibility study of signed consent for the collection of patient identifiable information for a national paediatric clinical audit databaseBMJ, 2005
- Paediatric cardiac surgical mortality in England after Bristol: descriptive analysis of hospital episode statistics 1991-2002BMJ, 2004
- Legislative threat to clinical science–the obfuscation and de-identification of protected health informationBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative studyJournal of Medical Ethics, 2004
- Education and debate: Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillance * Commentary: Don't waive consent lightly---involve the publicBMJ, 2002
- Selection Bias From Requiring Patients to Give Consent to Examine Data for Health Services ResearchArchives of Family Medicine, 2000