Validity of U.S. Nutritional Surveillance: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Caloric Energy Intake Data, 1971–2010
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 9 October 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (10), e76632
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076632
Abstract
Methodological limitations compromise the validity of U.S. nutritional surveillance data and the empirical foundation for formulating dietary guidelines and public health policies. Evaluate the validity of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) caloric intake data throughout its history, and examine trends in the validity of caloric intake estimates as the NHANES dietary measurement protocols evolved. Validity of data from 28,993 men and 34,369 women, aged 20 to 74 years from NHANES I (1971–1974) through NHANES 2009–2010 was assessed by: calculating physiologically credible energy intake values as the ratio of reported energy intake (rEI) to estimated basal metabolic rate (BMR), and subtracting estimated total energy expenditure (TEE) from NHANES rEI to create ‘disparity values’. 1) Physiologically credible values expressed as the ratio rEI/BMR and 2) disparity values (rEI–TEE). The historical rEI/BMR values for men and women were 1.31 and 1.19, (95% CI: 1.30–1.32 and 1.18–1.20), respectively. The historical disparity values for men and women were −281 and −365 kilocalorie-per-day, (95% CI: −299, −264 and −378, −351), respectively. These results are indicative of significant under-reporting. The greatest mean disparity values were −716 kcal/day and −856 kcal/day for obese (i.e., ≥30 kg/m2) men and women, respectively. Across the 39-year history of the NHANES, EI data on the majority of respondents (67.3% of women and 58.7% of men) were not physiologically plausible. Improvements in measurement protocols after NHANES II led to small decreases in underreporting, artifactual increases in rEI, but only trivial increases in validity in subsequent surveys. The confluence of these results and other methodological limitations suggest that the ability to estimate population trends in caloric intake and generate empirically supported public policy relevant to diet-health relationships from U.S. nutritional surveillance is extremely limited.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Height and Weight Bias: The Influence of TimePLOS ONE, 2013
- Self-Reported Energy Intake by Age in Overweight and Healthy-Weight Children in NHANES, 2001–2008PEDIATRICS, 2012
- Proximate composition and energy content of beef steaks as influenced by USDA quality grade and degree of donenessMeat Science, 2011
- Nutrient contribution of total and lean beef in diets of US children and adolescents: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004Meat Science, 2011
- The impact of revising fats and oils data in the US Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary StudiesJournal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2009
- The Effect of a Physical Activity Intervention on Bias in Self-Reported ActivityAnnals of Epidemiology, 2009
- Quality control procedures for the USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies nutrient valuesJournal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2008
- The effect of improved food composition data on intake estimates in the United States of AmericaJournal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2006
- Evaluation of under- and overreporting of energy intake in the 24-hour diet recalls in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)Public Health Nutrition, 2002
- A Semiparametric Transformation Approach to Estimating Usual Daily Intake DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996