Screening for Down's syndrome: effects, safety, and cost effectiveness of first and second trimester strategies Commentary: Results may not be widely applicable Authors' response
Open Access
- 25 August 2001
- Vol. 323 (7310), 423
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7310.423
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effects, safety, and cost effectiveness of antenatal screening strategies for Down's syndrome. Design: Analysis of incremental cost effectiveness. Setting: United Kingdom. Main outcome measures: Number of liveborn babies with Down's syndrome, miscarriages due to chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis, healthcare costs of screening programme, and additional costs and additional miscarriages per additional affected live birth prevented by adopting a more effective strategy. Results: Compared with no screening, the additional cost per additional liveborn baby with Down's syndrome prevented was £22 000 for measurement of nuchal translucency. The cost of the integrated test was £51 000 compared with measurement of nuchal translucency. All other strategies were more costly and less effective, or cost more per additional affected baby prevented. Depending on the cost of the screening test, the first trimester combined test and the quadruple test would also be cost effective options. Conclusions: The choice of screening strategy should be between the integrated test, first trimester combined test, quadruple test, or nuchal translucency measurement depending on how much service providers are willing to pay, the total budget available, and values on safety. Screening based on maternal age, the second trimester double test, and the first trimester serum test was less effective, less safe, and more costly than these four options. Footnotes Competing interests EMW holds the patent for use of inhibin A as a marker of Down's syndrome.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost-benefit analysis of prenatal diagnosis for down syndrome using the British or the American approachPublished by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ,2000
- Intra- and interoperator repeatability of the nuchal translucency measurementUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Use of the disutility ratio in prenatal screening for Down's syndromeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1999
- Screening of Maternal Serum for Fetal Down's Syndrome in the First TrimesterNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Abnormalities of the heart and great arteries in chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency thickness at 1l–13 weeks of gestationUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Justifying Prenatal Screening and Genetic Amniocentesis Programs by Cost-Effectiveness AnalysesMedical Decision Making, 1996
- Preferences of pregnant women for amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling for prenatal testing: Comparison of patients' choices and those of a decision-analytic modelJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- The imprecision in rates of down syndrome by 1‐year maternal age intervals: A critical analysis of rates used in biochemical screeningPrenatal Diagnosis, 1994
- Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome: the effect of routine ultrasound scan determination of gestational age and adjustment for maternal weightBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy.BMJ, 1988