Estimation of Prepractice Hydration Status of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Athletes
- 1 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Journal of Athletic Training/NATA in Journal of Athletic Training
- Vol. 44 (6), 624-629
- https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-44.6.624
Abstract
Context: To our knowledge, no one has compared the prepractice hydration status of male and female National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletes or has studied the effects of the menstrual cycle phase on women's prepractice hydration status. Objective: To report prepractice hydration status of collegiate athletes and determine the factors that might influence that status. Design: Cross-sectional, descriptive study. Setting: University sports team practices. Patients or Other Participants: Participants included 138 male and 125 female athletes (age = 19.9 ± 1.3 years, height = 165.8 ± 42.9 cm, mass = 77.4 ± 17.5 kg) from an NCAA Division I New England university. Intervention(s): One spontaneously voided (spot) urine sample was collected from each participant before his or her team practice and was measured 2 times. Main Outcome Measure(s): A refractometer was used to analyze the amount of light that passed through a small drop of urine and assess urine specific gravity. Fluid intake and menstrual history for women were also collected. Three hydration-status groups were defined based on the American College of Sports Medicine and National Athletic Trainers' Association criteria: (1) euhydrated, which was urine specific gravity less than 1.020; (2) hypohydrated, from 1.020 to 1.029; and (3) significantly hypohydrated, equal to or more than 1.030. Results: Thirteen percent of student-athletes appeared significantly hypohydrated, with a mean urine specific gravity of 1.031 ± 0.002 (χ2 = 12.12, P < .05); 53% appeared hypohydrated, with a mean urine specific gravity of 1.024 ± 0.003 (χ2 = 12.12, P < .05); and 34% appeared euhydrated, with a mean urine specific gravity of 1.012 ± 0.005 (χ2 = 0.03, P > .05). A greater percentage of men (47%) than women (28%) were hypohydrated (χ2 = 8.33, P < .05). In women, no difference was evident between the luteal and follicular phases of their menstrual cycles (χ2 = 0.02, P > .05). Conclusions: Before activity, athletes were hypohydrated at different levels. A greater percentage of men than women were hypohydrated. Menstrual cycle phase did not appear to affect hydration in women.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Urine specific gravity in exercisers prior to physical trainingApplied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 2006
- Hydration Assessment TechniquesNutrition Reviews, 2005
- Hydration Status in College Football Players during Consecutive Days of Twice-a-Day Preseason PracticesThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005
- Hydration Assessment TechniquesNutrition Reviews, 2005
- The Sweating Response of Elite Professional Soccer Players to Training in the HeatInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004
- Blood and urinary measures of hydration status during progressive acute dehydrationMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2001
- The Thermophysiology of Uncompensable Heat StressSports Medicine, 2000
- Effect of the menstrual cycle in ethanol pharmacokineticsJournal of Applied Toxicology, 1998
- Fluid Balance in Team SportsSports Medicine, 1997
- Interactions of Physical Training and Heat AcclimationSports Medicine, 1997