A multiple-level model of evolution and its implications for sociobiology
- 1 June 1981
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 4 (2), 225-235
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00008566
Abstract
The fundamental tenet of contemporary sociobiology, namely the assumption of a single process of evolution involving the selection of genes, is critically examined. An alternative multiple-level, multiple-process model of evolution is presented which posits that the primary process that operates via selection upon the genes cannot account for certain kinds of biological phenomena, especially complex, learned, social behaviours. The primary process has evolved subsidiary evolutionary levels and processes that act to bridge the gap between genes and these complex behaviours. The subsidiary levels are development, individual animal learning, and socioculture itself. It is argued that individual learning is pivotal to the derivation and biological analysis of culture. The differences between cultural and noncultural societies are stressed. It is concluded that such a multiple-level model of evolution can form the basis for reconciling opposing sides in the sociobiology debate.Keywords
This publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- Units “of” selection: The end of “of”?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1981
- Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasiteNature, 1980
- Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolutionNature, 1980
- Beyond neo-Darwinism—an epigenetic approach to evolutionJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1979
- Evolutionarily stable nesting strategy in a digger waspJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1979
- The adaptive significance of cultural behavior: Comments and replyHuman Ecology, 1977
- The search for a general theory of behaviorBehavioral Science, 1975
- Genetics and the diversity of behavior.American Psychologist, 1972
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964
- Problems in the bio-psychology of social organization.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1946