Mixed-methods research
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Research in Nursing
- Vol. 11 (3), 195-203
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987106064635
Abstract
The claim that mixed methods is the third methodological movement of the twentieth century could have unexpected consequences for the future of research in the social sciences and health disciplines. Implied is a belief that the mixing of qualitative and quantitative methods will produce the ‘best of both worlds’. This assumption, combined with inherent promises of inclusiveness, takes on a reality and certainty in research findings that serves well the powerful nexus of economic restraint and evidence-based practice. I argue that the use of the terms ‘qualitative’ and ‘quantitative’ as normative descriptors reinforces their binary positioning, effectively marginalising the methodological diversity within them. Ideologically, mixed methods covers for the continuing hegemony of positivism, albeit in its more moderate, postpositivist form. If naively interpreted, mixed methods could become the preferred approach in the teaching and doing of research. Rather than the promotion of more co-operative and complex designs for increasingly complex social and health issues, economic and administrative pressures may lead to demands for the ‘quick fix’ that mixed methods appears to offer.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The generative potential of mixed methods inquiry1International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2005
- Evolving Trends in Qualitative Research: Advances in Mixed-Method DesignQualitative Health Research, 2005
- Postcolonial Nursing Scholarship: From Epistemology to MethodAdvances in Nursing Science, 2002
- The Bricoleur with a Computer: Piecing Together Qualitative and Quantitative DataQualitative Health Research, 1999
- Getting Started: Labels, Camps, and TeamsQualitative Health Research, 1991
- Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth)International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1985