Gender, formal organizational status and humor use: perceptions of social acceptance
- 10 December 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Journal of Managerial Psychology
- Vol. 37 (4), 332-345
- https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-11-2020-0593
Abstract
Humor can be a useful tool in the workplace, but it remains unclear whether humor used by men versus women is perceived similarly due to social role expectations. This paper explored whether female humorists have less social latitude in their use of aggressive and affiliative humor in the workplace. This paper also examined how formal organizational status and the target's gender can impact audience perceptions. Two scenario-based studies were conducted where participants rated the foolishness of the humorist. For Study 1, participants responded to a scenario with an aggressive, humorous comment. For Study 2, participants responded to a scenario with an affiliative, humorous comment. Results suggested that high-status female humorists who used aggressive humor with low-status women were viewed as less foolish than low-status female humorists who used aggressive humor with low-status women. Conversely, status did not impact perceptions of male humorists who used aggressive humor with low-status women. Results also indicated that high-status women who used affiliative humor were viewed as less foolish when their humor was directed toward low-status men versus low-status women. Conversely, no differences existed for high-status men who used affiliative humor with low-status men and women. Narrower social role expectations for women suggest that interpersonal humor can be a riskier strategy for women. This study suggests that women have less social latitude in their use of humor at work, and that organizational status and target gender influence perceptions of female humorists.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leadersJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012
- Others' anger makes people work harder not smarter: The effect of observing anger and sarcasm on creative and analytic thinking.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011
- Prejudice Toward Female Leaders: Backlash Effects and Women’s Impression Management DilemmaSocial and Personality Psychology Compass, 2010
- The Case for Developing New Research on Humor and Culture in Organizations: Toward a Higher Grade of ManureResearch in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 2007
- Female first, leader second? Gender bias in the encoding of leadership behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2006
- Same Behavior, Different Consequences: Reactions to Men's and Women's Altruistic Citizenship Behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005
- Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles QuestionnaireJournal of Research in Personality, 2003
- Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the WorkplaceDiscourse Studies, 2000
- A theory of humor elicitation.Psychological Review, 1992
- Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature.Psychological Bulletin, 1986