Ecological, practical, and political inputs into selection of weed targets: What makes a good biological control target?
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Biological Control
- Vol. 35 (3), 183-196
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.07.009
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- How good are we at predicting the field host-range of fungal pathogens used for classical biological control of weeds?Biological Control, 2004
- Differential susceptibility of Russian thistle accessions to Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesBiological Control, 2004
- Chondrostereum purpureum as a biological control agent in forest vegetation management. III. Infection survey of a national field trialCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 1999
- An Evaluation of the Wilt-Causing Bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum as a Potential Biological Control Agent for the Alien Kahili Ginger (Hedychium gardnerianum) in Hawaiian ForestsBiological Control, 1999
- Population Dynamics and Spread ofPuccinia carduorumin the Eastern United StatesPlant Disease, 1996
- Constraints in the Development of BioherbicidesWeed Technology, 1995
- Field Evaluation of Puccinia carduorum for Biological Control of Musk ThistleBiological Control, 1993
- Host Range Determination of Puccinia jaceae from Yellow StarthistlePlant Disease, 1989
- Taxonomy of a fungus introduced into Hawaii for biological control of Ageratina riparia (Eupatorieae; Compositae), with observations on related weed pathogensTransactions of the British Mycological Society, 1988
- Bentazon Reduces Rust-Induced Disease in Yellow Nutsedge,Cyperus esculentusWeed Technology, 1988