Making Sanitation Count: Developing and Testing a Device for Assessing Latrine Use in Low-Income Settings
- 9 February 2012
- journal article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Science & Technology
- Vol. 46 (6), 3295-3303
- https://doi.org/10.1021/es2036702
Abstract
While efforts are underway to expand latrine coverage to an estimated 2.6 billion people who lack access to improved sanitation, there is evidence that actual use of latrines is suboptimal, limiting the potential health and environmental gains from containment of human excreta. We developed a passive latrine use monitor (PLUM) and compared its ability to measure latrine activity with structured observation. Each PLUM consisted of a passive infrared motion detector, microcontroller, data storage card, and batteries mounted in a small plastic housing that was positioned inside the latrine. During a field trial in Orissa, India, with ∼115 households, the number of latrine events measured by the PLUMs was in good agreement with that measured by trained observers during 5 h of structured observation per device per week. A significant finding was that the presence of a human observer was associated with a statistically significant increase in the number of latrine events, i.e., the users modified their behavior in response to the observer. Another advantage of the PLUM was the ability to measure activity continuously for an entire week. A shortcoming of the PLUM was the inability to separate latrine events that occurred in immediate succession, leading to possible undercounting during high-traffic periods. The PLUM is a promising technology that can provide detailed measures of latrine use to improve the understanding of sanitation behaviors and how to modify them and for assessing the intended health, livelihood, and environmental benefits of improved sanitation.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Causal inference methods to study nonrandomized, preexisting development interventionsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- Assessment of latrine use and quality and association with risk of trachoma in rural TanzaniaTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2010
- Comparing the Effectiveness of Shared versus Private Latrines in Preventing Trachoma in Rural TanzaniaThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2010
- Experimental Pretesting of Hand-Washing Interventions in a Natural SettingAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2009
- Water handling, sanitation and defecation practices in rural southern India: a knowledge, attitudes and practices studyTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2007
- Characteristics of latrine promotion participants and non‐participants; inspection of latrines; and perceptions of household latrines in Northern GhanaTropical Medicine & International Health, 2007
- Follow‐up of a low cost latrine promotion programme in one district of Amhara, Ethiopia: characteristics of early adopters and non‐adoptersTropical Medicine & International Health, 2006
- Achieving the ‘good life’: Why some people want latrines in rural BeninSocial Science & Medicine, 2005
- Measuring hygiene practices: a comparison of questionnaires with direct observations in rural ZaïreTropical Medicine & International Health, 1997
- Reactivity and repeatability of hygiene behaviour: Structured observations from Burkina FasoSocial Science & Medicine, 1996