Biological age as a useful index to predict seventeen-year survival and mortality in Koreans
Open Access
- 5 January 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Geriatrics
- Vol. 17 (1), 1-10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0407-y
Abstract
Many studies have been conducted to quantitatively estimate biological age using measurable biomarkers. Biological age should function as a valid proxy for aging, which is closely related with future work ability, frailty, physical fitness, and/or mortality. A validation study using cohort data found biological age to be a superior index for disease-related mortality than chronological age. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the validity of biological age as a useful index to predict a person’s risk of death in the future. The data consists of 13,106 cases of death from 557,940 Koreans at 20–93 years old, surveyed from 1994 to 2011. Biological ages were computed using 15 biomarkers measured in general health check-ups using an algorithm based on principal component analysis. The influence of biological age on future mortality was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression considering gender, chronological age, and event type. In the living subjects, the average biological age was almost the same as the average chronological age. In the deceased, the biological age was larger than the chronological age: largest increment of biological age over chronological age was observed when their baseline chronological age was within 50–59 years. The death rate significantly increased as biological age became larger than chronological age (linear trend test, p value < 0.0001). The largest hazard ratio was observed in subjects whose baseline chronological age was within 50–59 years when the cause was death from non-cancerous diseases (HR = 1.30, 95% confidence intervals = 1.26 - 1.34). The survival probability, over the 17 year term of the study, was significantly decreased in the people whose biological age was larger than chronological age (log rank test, p value < 0.001). Biological age could be used to predict future risk of death, and its effect size varied according to gender, chronological age, and cause of death.Funding Information
- Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI14C2686)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gamma-glutamyl transferase: risk and prognosis of cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 2012
- Constructing an index of physical fitness age for Japanese elderly based on 7-year longitudinal data: sex differences in estimated physical fitness ageAGE, 2011
- Developing a biological age assessment equation using principal component analysis and clinical biomarkers of aging in Korean menArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 2009
- Mortality Partitions and their Relevance to Research on SenescenceBiogerontology, 2006
- Biological aging and Cox hazard analysis of mortality trends in a Mennonite community from south-central KansasAmerican Journal of Human Biology, 2006
- A new approach to the concept and computation of biological ageMechanisms of Ageing and Development, 2006
- Factors Affecting Retirement MortalityNorth American Actuarial Journal, 2003
- Strategy for identifying biomarkers of aging in long-lived speciesExperimental Gerontology, 2001
- Detection of a unique ?-glutamyl transpeptidase messenger RNA species closely related to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in humans: A new candidate for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinomaJournal of Hepatology, 1996
- Biological age and its estimation. II. Assessment of biological age of albino rats by multiple regression analysisExperimental Gerontology, 1983