The last mile(s) in modern input distribution: Pricing, profitability, and adoption
- 24 September 2013
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Agricultural Economics
- Vol. 44 (6), 629-646
- https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12078
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Farmer Field Schools on Agricultural Productivity and Poverty in East AfricaWorld Development, 2012
- Subsidies and Crowding Out: A Double‐Hurdle Model of Fertilizer Demand in MalawiAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2011
- From Best Practice to Best Fit: A Framework for Designing and Analyzing Pluralistic Agricultural Advisory Services WorldwideThe Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 2009
- Factors influencing the profitability of fertilizer use on maize in ZambiaAgricultural Economics, 2009
- Input Subsidies to Improve Smallholder Maize Productivity in Malawi: Toward an African Green RevolutionPLoS Biology, 2009
- Do input subsidy programs “crowd in” or “crowd out” commercial market development? Modeling fertilizer demand in a two‐channel marketing systemAgricultural Economics, 2009
- How High Are Rates of Return to Fertilizer? Evidence from Field Experiments in KenyaThe American Economic Review, 2008
- Teacher Absence in India: A SnapshotJournal of the European Economic Association, 2005
- Sending Farmers Back to School: The Impact of Farmer Field Schools in IndonesiaApplied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 2004
- Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A SurveyEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 1985