Global landscape assessment of screening technologies for medicine quality assurance: stakeholder perceptions and practices from ten countries
Open Access
- 25 April 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Globalization and Health
- Vol. 14 (1), 43
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0360-y
Abstract
The spread of substandard and falsified (SF) medical products constitutes a growing global public health concern. Some countries use portable, handheld screening technologies (STs) in the field to accelerate detection of SF medicines and reduce the number of medicine samples that undergo costly and time-consuming confirmatory analysis. A multi-country, multi-stakeholder landscape assessment utilizing qualitative methodology was used to examine practices and perceptions related to the use of STs. Qualitative interview guides were designed using the results of a literature review and comprised of open-ended questions with the study participants, who were from national medicine regulatory authorities, pharmaceutical manufacturers, pharmacies, and distributors. Ten geographically and economically diverse countries were selected: Argentina, China, Egypt, India, Jordan, Mexico, Nigeria, Philippines, the United States, and Zimbabwe. Of the completed 53 interviews, 32 were in-person, 16 were phone interviews, and 5 were via written questionnaires. Data analysis shows a wide variation in understanding and usage of STs in different sectors. Virtually all of the study participants indicated a lack of objective, accessible information on STs to advise them on what technologies would be beneficial for their needs. Study participants also described their ideal capabilities of the next generation of STs, including shareable spectral libraries, lower acquisition costs, lesser training requirements, and in-country maintenance and technical support. The results and recommendations presented in this article can be used to help regulators communicate and justify their needs to acquire and invest in new STs. There is a need for additional standardized, trustworthy and scientifically sound evaluations of STs, and to support regulators to effectively deploy the most promising technologies. ST manufacturers can take into account some of the limitations of the technologies the interviewees identified in this article, such as a dearth of technologies, which provide quantitative information about the active ingredient, and take steps to address them to better serve their customers. These results and recommendations, can catalyze research and actionable interventions into the development, review, application, and use of STs.This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding and fighting the medicine counterfeit marketJournal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2014
- Substandard drugs: a potential crisis for public healthBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2013
- Counterfeit drugs in Nigeria: A threat to public healthAfrican Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 2013
- What to do about unsafe medicines?BMJ, 2013
- Stemming the Global Trade in Falsified and Substandard MedicinesJAMA, 2013
- Assessment of the performance of a handheld Raman device for potential use as a screening tool in evaluating medicines qualityJournal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2013
- The Emerging Field of Medicines Authentication by Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance SpectroscopyApplied Magnetic Resonance, 2012
- Comparative evaluation of pharmaceutical products obtained in Mexico: augmenting existing scientific dataDrug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 2011
- Quality of medical devices and in vitro diagnostics in resource‐limited settingsTropical Medicine & International Health, 2011
- Poor quality drugs: grand challenges in high throughput detection, countrywide sampling, and forensics in developing countriesThe Analyst, 2010