Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes
- 1 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Vol. 19 (8), 1497-1512
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2857-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2010
- Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Robotic-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer: Case-Matched Analysis of Short-Term OutcomesAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2010
- Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Summary of the Current EvidenceThe Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2009
- Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: A ReviewAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2009
- Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trialThe Lancet, 2009
- Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986