Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes?
Open Access
- 21 March 2015
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Prostate International
- Vol. 3 (2), 47-50
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2015.03.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Resident Involvement on Urological Surgery Outcomes: An Analysis of 40,000 Patients from the ACS NSQIP DatabaseJournal of Urology, 2014
- Comparison of Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy with Respect to Trainee Involvement Utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramJournal of Endourology, 2014
- Functional and Oncologic Outcomes of Graded Bladder Neck Preservation During Robot-Assisted Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Endourology, 2014
- It Is Safe to Teach Residents Laser Prostate Surgery in the Private Practice SettingUrology, 2013
- Surgeon Fatigue: Impact of Case Order on Perioperative Parameters and Patient OutcomesJournal of Urology, 2012
- Overcoming the Learning Curve for Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyUrologic Clinics of North America, 2010
- Training the urologic oncologist of the future: Where are the challenges?Urologic Oncology, 2009
- Training of Urologic Oncology Fellows Does Not Adversely Impact Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic ProstatectomyJournal of Endourology, 2009
- Modular Training for Residents with no Prior Experience with Open Pelvic Surgery in Endoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2006
- “And Doctor, no residents please!”Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2003