Evaluating the Medical Malpractice System and Options for Reform
Open Access
- 1 May 2011
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Vol. 25 (2), 93-110
- https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.2.93
Abstract
The U.S. medical malpractice liability system has two principal objectives: to compensate patients who are injured through the negligence of healthcare providers and to deter providers from practicing negligently. In practice, however, the system is slow and costly to administer. It both fails to compensate patients who have suffered from bad medical care and compensates those who haven't. According to opinion surveys of physicians, the system creates incentives to undertake cost-ineffective treatments based on fear of legal liability—to practice “defensive medicine.” The failures of the liability system and the high cost of health care in the United States have led to an important debate over tort policy. How well does malpractice law achieve its intended goals? How large of a problem is defensive medicine and can reforms to malpractice law reduce its impact on healthcare spending? The flaws of the existing system have led a number of states to change their laws in a way that would reduce malpractice liability—to adopt “tort reforms.” Evidence from several studies suggests that wisely chosen reforms have the potential to reduce healthcare spending significantly with no adverse impact on patient health outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- National Costs Of The Medical Liability SystemHealth Affairs, 2010
- Relationship Between Malpractice Litigation Pressure and Rates of Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean SectionMedical Care, 2009
- Malpractice Liability Costs And The Practice Of Medicine In The Medicare ProgramHealth Affairs, 2007
- “Health Courts” and Accountability for Patient SafetyThe Milbank Quarterly, 2006
- The Impact of State Laws Limiting Malpractice Damage Awards on Health Care ExpendituresAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2006
- Defensive Medicine Among High-Risk Specialist Physicians in a Volatile Malpractice EnvironmentJAMA, 2005
- Have State Caps On Malpractice Awards Increased The Supply Of Physicians?Health Affairs, 2005
- The Medical Malpractice ‘Crisis’: Recent Trends And The Impact Of State Tort ReformsHealth Affairs, 2004
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?JAMA, 1999
- No-Fault Compensation for Medical Injury: A Case StudyHealth Affairs, 1995