Surgical Versus Percutaneous Occlusion of Ostium Secundum Atrial Septal Defects: Results and Cost-Effective Considerations in a Low-Income Country
- 17 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 47 (2), 326-331
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.06.086
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Short- and intermediate-term results of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect with the Amplatzer Septal OccluderAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Transcatheter Atrial Septal Defect Closure Assisted by Intracardiac Echocardiography: 3‐Year Follow‐UpJournal of Interventional Cardiology, 2004
- Comparison of heart rate variability between surgical and interventional closure of atrial septal defect in childrenThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2003
- Transcatheter closure of very large (≥ 25 mm) atrial septal defects using the Amplatzer septal occluderCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2003
- Comparison of transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect using the Amplatzer septal occluder associated with deficient versus sufficient rimsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2002
- Surgical and transcatheter (Amplatzer) closure of atrial septal defects: a prospective comparison of results and costHeart, 2002
- Current outcomes of surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defectThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1994
- Long-term follow-up (9 to 20 years) after surgical closure of atrial septal defect at a young ageThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Congenital heart disease in a cohort of 19,502 births with long-term follow-upThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1978
- Secundum atrial septal defect. Nonoperative closure during cardiac catheterizationJAMA, 1976