Insect societies as divided organisms: The complexities of purpose and cross-purpose
- 15 May 2007
- journal article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 104 (suppl_1), 8619-8626
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701285104
Abstract
Individual organisms are complex in a special way. The organization and function of their parts seem directed toward a purpose: the survival and reproduction of that individual. Groups of organisms are different. They may also be complex, but that is usually because their parts, the individual organisms, are working at cross-purposes. The most obvious exception to this rule is the social insects. Here, the individuals cooperate in complex ways toward the common goal of the success of the colony, even if it means that most of them do not reproduce. Kin selection theory explains how this can evolve. Nonreproductive individuals help in the reproduction of their kin, who share and transmit their genes. Such help is most favored when individuals can give more to their kin than they give up by not reproducing directly. For example, they can remain at their natal site and help defend a valuable resource ("fortress defenders"), or they can ensure that at least one adult survives to care for helpless young ("life insurers"). Although kin selection explains the extensive cooperation and common purpose of social insect colonies, it also predicts a certain amount of cross-purpose and conflict behavior. Kin selection has predicted how workers and queens disagree over sex ratios, how potential queens struggle to be the colony's head, how workers try to produce sons, and how other workers often prevent them. Kin selection analysis of cooperation and conflict in social insects is one of the outstanding achievements of evolutionary theory.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- Working-class royalty: bees beat the caste systemBiology Letters, 2005
- The Kinship Theory of Genomic ImprintingAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2000
- Size and complexity among multicellular organismsBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1997
- Genetic ConflictsThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1996
- Three conditions for the evolution of eusociality: Are they sufficient?Insectes Sociaux, 1994
- Extended parental care and the origin of eusocialityProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1994
- Worker Matricide in Social Bees and WaspsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1994
- The blind leading the blind in army ant raid patterns: Testing a model of self-organization (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)Journal of Insect Behavior, 1991
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IIJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964