State Expenditures for Tobacco-Control Programs and the Tobacco Settlement

Abstract
Gross et al. (Oct. 3 issue)1 provide a timely study of the effects of the November 1998 Master Settlement Agreement with tobacco companies. Unfortunately, their summary of state efforts does not include Arkansas, a state with one of the highest rates of tobacco-related deaths in the nation, minimal previous expenditures on tobacco control, and low per capita income.2,3 Despite the findings of Gross et al. that these characteristics are associated with decreased funding of tobacco-control efforts, Arkansas allocated all funds from the Master Settlement Agreement to new health programs and prioritized funds according to guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.3

This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit: