Hyperpolarized3He MR Imaging: Physiologic Monitoring Observations and Safety Considerations in 100 Consecutive Subjects
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 248 (2), 655-661
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2482071838
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the safety of hyperpolarized helium 3 (3He) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Materials and Methods Local institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Physiologic monitoring data were obtained before, during, and after hyperpolarized 3He MR imaging in 100 consecutive subjects (57 men, 43 women; mean age, 52 years ± 14 [standard deviation]). The subjects inhaled 1–3 L of a gas mixture containing 300–500 mL 3He and 0–2700 mL N2 and held their breath for up to 15 seconds during MR imaging. Heart rate and rhythm and oxygen saturation of hemoglobin as measured by pulse oximetry (Spo2) were monitored continuously throughout each study. The effects of 3He MR imaging on vital signs and Spo2 and the relationship between pulmonary function, number of doses, and clinical classification (healthy volunteers, patients with asthma, heavy smokers, patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema, and patients with lung cancer) and the lowest observed Spo2 were assessed. Any subjective symptoms were noted. Results Except for a small postimaging decrease in mean heart rate (from 78 beats per minute ± 13 to 73 beats per minute ± 11, P < .001), there was no effect on vital signs. A mean transient decrease in Spo2 of 4% ± 3 was observed during the first minute after gas inhalation (P < .001) in 77 subjects who inhaled a dose of 1 L for 10 seconds or less, reaching a nadir of less than 90% at least once in 20 subjects and of less than 85% in four subjects. There was no correlation between the lowest Spo2 and pulmonary function parameters other than baseline Spo2 (r = 0.36, P = .001). The lowest mean Spo2 varied by 1% between the first and second and second and third doses (P < .001) and was unrelated to clinical classification (P = .40). Minor subjective symptoms were noted by 10 subjects. No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusion Hyperpolarized 3He MR imaging can be safely performed in healthy subjects, heavy smokers, and those with severe obstructive airflow limitation, although unpredictable transient desaturation suggests that potential subjects should be carefully screened for comorbidities. © RSNA, 2008Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Functional lung imaging using hyperpolarized gas MRIJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2007
- Assessment of lung development using hyperpolarized helium-3 diffusion MR imagingJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2006
- Hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI and histology in pulmonary emphysemaMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2006
- Hyperpolarized 3-Helium Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Probe Lung FunctionProceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 2005
- MRI in lung transplant recipients using hyperpolarized3He: Comparison with CTJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2002
- Hyperpolarized 3He MR lung ventilation imaging in asthmatics: Preliminary findingsJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2001
- Hyperpolarized3He gas production and MR imaging of the lungConcepts in Magnetic Resonance, 2001
- MR imaging of diffusion of3He gas in healthy and diseased lungsMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2000
- Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging with hyperpolarised helium-3The Lancet, 1996
- Solubility Relations of Fluorine Compounds and Inert Gas NarcosisNature, 1964