Balancing the Benefits and Risks of Inhaled Long-Acting Beta-Agonists — The Influence of Values
- 16 April 2009
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 360 (16), 1592-1595
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp0810561
Abstract
In December 2008, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) convened a joint meeting of the Pediatric Advisory Committee, the Pulmonary–Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee, and the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee (of which I am a member) to review the risks and benefits of inhaled long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) for the treatment of asthma in adults and children. Committee members were asked to weigh the public health implications of real and serious but relatively infrequent occurrences of severe asthma exacerbations and asthma-related death against the symptomatic benefits of bronchodilation and asthma control. The drugs in question included single-agent LABA products (salmeterol, or Serevent [GlaxoSmithKline], and formoterol, or Foradil [Novartis]) and LABAs available in combination with inhaled corticosteroids (fluticasone plus salmeterol, marketed as Advair [GlaxoSmithKline], and budesonide plus formoterol, marketed as Symbicort [AstraZeneca]). The FDA's continuing approval of an asthma indication for these agents was at stake.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risks of Long-Acting Beta-Agonists in Achieving Asthma ControlNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- The Salmeterol Multicenter Asthma Research TrialSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2006
- Safety of Long-Acting Beta-Agonists — An Urgent Need to Clear the AirNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005