Major Advances in Globalization and Consolidation of the Artificial Insemination Industry
Open Access
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Dairy Science Association in Journal of Dairy Science
- Vol. 89 (4), 1362-1368
- https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72203-2
Abstract
The artificial insemination (AI) industry in the United States has gone through many consolidations, mergers, and acquisitions over the past 25 yr. There are 5 major AI companies in the United States today: 3 large cooperatives, 1 private company, and 1 public company. The latter 2 have majority ownership outside of the United States. The AI industry in the United States progeny-tests more than 1,000 Holstein young sires per year. Because healthy, mature dairy bulls are capable of producing well over 100,000 straws of frozen semen per year, only a relatively small number of bulls are needed to breed the world's population of dairy cows. Most AI companies in the United States do not own many, if any, females and tend to utilize the same maternal families in their breeding programs. Little differences exist among the selection programs of the AI companies in the United States. The similarity of breeding programs and the extreme semen-production capabilities of bulls have contributed to difficulties the AI companies have had in developing genetically different product lines. Exports of North American Holstein genetics increased steadily from the 1970s into the 1990s because of the perceived superiority of North American Holsteins for dairy traits compared with European strains, especially for production. The breeding industry moved towards international genetic evaluations of bulls in the 1990s, with the International Bull Evaluation Service (Interbull) in Sweden coordinating the evaluations. The extensive exchange of elite genetics has led to a global dairy genetics industry with bulls that are closely related, and the average inbreeding level for the major dairy breeds continues to increase. Genetic markers have been used extensively and successfully by the industry for qualitative traits, especially for recessive genetic disorders, but markers have had limited impact for quantitative traits. Selection emphasis continues to migrate away from production traits and towards nonproduction traits, especially towards health and fitness traits. Specifically, fertility has arguably become the major breeding and management issue facing dairy farmers today. Some producers have implemented crossbreeding programs in an effort to capitalize on heterosis, and crossbreeding will almost certainly need to be a bigger part of the AI companies business in the years ahead.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sustaining the Fertility of Artificially Inseminated Dairy Cattle: The Role of the Artificial Insemination IndustryJournal of Dairy Science, 2004
- Development of a National Genetic Evaluation for Cow FertilityJournal of Dairy Science, 2004
- Progeny Testing and Selection Intensity for Holstein Bulls in Different CountriesJournal of Dairy Science, 2003
- Timeliness and Effectiveness of Progeny Testing Through Artificial InseminationJournal of Dairy Science, 2003
- A Genome Scan To Identify Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Economically Important Traits in a US Holstein PopulationJournal of Dairy Science, 2001
- Overview of Progeny-Test Programs of Artificial-Insemination Organizations in the United StatesJournal of Dairy Science, 2001
- Consequences of Selection for Milk Yield from a Geneticist's ViewpointJournal of Dairy Science, 2000
- Implementing Technology for Genetic Improvement: Industry's ViewJournal of Dairy Science, 1988
- Increased rates of genetic change in dairy cattle by embryo transfer and splittingAnimal Science, 1983
- Artificial Insemination OrganizationsJournal of Dairy Science, 1981