Detecting and Correcting the Lies That Data Tell
- 18 May 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Vol. 5 (3), 233-242
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369339
Abstract
Because of the way in which data are typically analyzed and interpreted, they frequently lie to researchers, leading to conclusions that are not only false but more complex than the underlying reality. The several examples of this presented in this article illustrate the possibility that although data may appear to indicate complex phenomena at the surface structure level, the phenomena may be quite simple at the deep structure level, suggesting the possibility of applying Occam’s razor to achieve the scientific goal of parsimony. The approaches to data analysis described in this article may also lead to a solution to the serious problem of construct proliferation in psychology by demonstrating that many constructs are redundant with other existing constructs. The major obstacles to these outcomes are researchers' continued reliance on the use of statistical significance testing in data analysis and interpretation and the failure to correct for the distorting effects of sampling error, measurement error, and other artifacts. Some of these problems have been addressed by the now widespread use of meta-analysis, but examination of the meta-analyses appearing in Psychological Bulletin from 1978 to 2006 shows that most employ a statistically inappropriate model for meta-analysis (the fixed effects model) and that 90% do not correct for the biasing effects of measurement error. Hence, there is still a long way to go in the improvement of data analysis and interpretation methods.This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standards for Reporting on Empirical Social Science Research in AERA PublicationsEducational Researcher, 2006
- Inference by Eye: Confidence Intervals and How to Read Pictures of Data.American Psychologist, 2005
- The harm done by tests of significanceAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2003
- The earth is round (p < .05).American Psychologist, 1994
- The case for confidence intervals in controlled clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1994
- Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.Psychological Bulletin, 1984
- Reflections on methods of statistical inference in research on the effect of safety countermeasuresAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1983
- The Cost of DichotomizationApplied Psychological Measurement, 1983
- The Case Against Statistical Significance TestingHarvard Educational Review, 1978
- The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962