Board Characteristics, Audit Committee Characteristics and Abnormal Accruals
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Pacific Accounting Review
- Vol. 18 (2), 47-68
- https://doi.org/10.1108/01140580610732813
Abstract
This paper examines the relation between governance (as measured by board and audit committee characteristics) and accounting quality (as measured by abnormal accruals) in a setting where there is no a priori reason to suspect systematic management of earnings. Using data from Singapore and Malaysia, we find both board size and audit committee independence are related to lower abnormal working capital accruals. Furthermore, the relation between audit committee independence and higher quality accounting exists only when the abnormal accruals are income increasing. This suggests that audit committees are effective in the financial reporting process by reducing the level of income increasing abnormal accruals. The results also indicate that audit committees are effective only when all members are independent directors.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Relationship between Board Characteristics and Voluntary Improvements in Audit Committee Composition and Experience*Contemporary Accounting Research, 2001
- The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control SystemsThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Conservatism and Auditor-Client NegotiationsJournal of Accounting Research, 1991
- Outside directors and CEO turnoverJournal of Financial Economics, 1988
- Evidence of Earnings Management from the Provision for Bad DebtsJournal of Accounting Research, 1988
- Earnings Management in an Overlapping Generations ModelJournal of Accounting Research, 1988
- The Takeover Market, Corporate Board Composition, and Ownership Structure: The Case of BankingThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1987
- Large Shareholders and Corporate ControlJournal of Political Economy, 1986
- Separation of Ownership and ControlThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983
- Agency Problems and the Theory of the FirmJournal of Political Economy, 1980