Evaluation of Resin Composite Translucency by Two Different Methods
Open Access
- 1 April 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Operative Dentistry in Operative Dentistry
- Vol. 38 (3), E76-E90
- https://doi.org/10.2341/12-085-l
Abstract
Composite translucency varies by manufacturer. This information should be considered when selecting materials and clinical techniques to improve clinical performance. The purpose of this study was 1) to compare the translucency of seven different types of composite materials and three different shade categories (dentin, enamel, and translucent) by determining the translucency parameter (TP) and light transmittance (%T) and 2) to evaluate the correlation between the results of the two evaluation methods. Three shades (dentin A3, enamel A3, and clear translucent) of seven composite materials (Beautifil II [BF], Denfil [DF], Empress Direct [ED], Estelite Sigma Quick [ES], Gradia Direct [GD], Premise [PR], and Tetric N-Ceram [TC]) from different manufacturers were screened in this study. Ten disk-shaped specimens (10 mm in diameter and 1 mm in thickness) were prepared for each material. For the TP measurements, the colors of each specimen were recorded according to the CIELAB color scale against white and black backgrounds with a colorimeter and used to calculate the TP value. For the %T measurements, the mean direct transmittance through the specimen in the range between 380 and 780 nm was recorded using a spectrometer and computer software. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were performed to compare the TP and %T for the composite materials and shade categories. One-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used for the seven composite materials per shade category and the three shade categories per composite material. The correlation between the two evaluation methods was determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient. All statistical procedures were performed within a 95% confidence level. TP differed significantly by composite material within each shade category (ppppr=0.626, pr=0.763-0.992, pr=0.403-0.528, p<0.05).Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spectrophotometric comparison of translucent composites and natural enamelJournal of Dentistry, 2010
- Translucency, opalescence and light transmission characteristics of light-cured resin compositesDental Materials, 2010
- Spectroradiometric and spectrophotometric translucency of ceramic materialsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2010
- Translucency and masking ability of various opaque-shade composite resinsJournal of Dentistry, 2009
- Differences in color, translucency and fluorescence between flowable and universal resin compositesJournal of Dentistry, 2008
- Influence of color parameters of resin composites on their translucencyDental Materials, 2008
- Comparison of translucency between indirect and direct resin compositesJournal of Dentistry, 2008
- Change of Color and Translucency by Light Curing in Resin CompositesOperative Dentistry, 2006
- Colour and translucency of opaque‐shades and body‐shades of resin compositesEuropean Journal of Oral Sciences, 2005
- Color and Translucency of Resin Composites for Layering TechniquesDental Materials Journal, 2005