Difference in label length between demethylchlortetracycline and oxytetracycline: Implications for the interpretation of bone histomorphometric data
- 1 February 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Calcified Tissue International
- Vol. 48 (2), 74-77
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02555869
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Label escape theory revisited: The effects of resting periods and section thicknessBone, 1989
- Bone appositional rate and percentage of doubly and singly labeled surfaces: Comparison of data from 5 and 20 μm sectionsBone, 1987
- Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committeeJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1987
- Metabolic bone disease with and without osteomalacia after intestinal bypass surgery: A bone histomorphometric studyBone, 1985
- A classification of in vivo bone labels after double labeling in canine bonesBone, 1985
- Irreversible bone loss in osteomalacia. Comparison of radial photon absorptiometry with iliac bone histomorphometry during treatment.JCI Insight, 1985
- The Dose-response Relationship of Tetracycline to the Detectability of Labeled Osteons by Fluorescence MicroscopyPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1977
- Tetracycline-based histological analysis of bone remodelingCalcified Tissue International, 1969
- Tetracycline Bone LabelingThe Journal of New Drugs, 1961
- Clinical pharmacology of the tetracycline antibioticsClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1961