Control Group Design, Contamination and Drop-Out in Exercise Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review
Open Access
- 27 March 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 10 (3), e0120996
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120996
Abstract
Important considerations for exercise trials in cancer patients are contamination and differential drop-out among the control group members that might jeopardize the internal validity. This systematic review provides an overview of different control groups design characteristics of exercise-oncology trials and explores the association with contamination and drop-out rates. Randomized controlled exercise-oncology trials from two Cochrane reviews were included. Additionally, a computer-aided search using Medline (Pubmed), Embase and CINAHL was conducted after completion date of the Cochrane reviews. Eligible studies were classified according to three control group design characteristics: the exercise instruction given to controls before start of the study (exercise allowed or not); and the intervention the control group was offered during (any (e.g., education sessions or telephone contacts) or none) or after (any (e.g., cross-over or exercise instruction) or none) the intervention period. Contamination (yes or no) and excess drop-out rates (i.e., drop-out rate of the control group minus the drop-out rate exercise group) were described according to the three design characteristics of the control group and according to the combinations of these three characteristics; so we additionally made subgroups based on combinations of type and timing of instructions received. 40 exercise-oncology trials were included based on pre-specified eligibility criteria. The lowest contamination (7.1% of studies) and low drop-out rates (excess drop-out rate -4.7±9.2) were found in control groups offered an intervention after the intervention period. When control groups were offered an intervention both during and after the intervention period, contamination (0%) and excess drop-out rates (-10.0±12.8%) were even lower. Control groups receiving an intervention during and after the study intervention period have lower contamination and drop-out rates. The present findings can be considered when designing future exercise-oncology trials.This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exercise for health: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating the impact of a pragmatic, translational exercise intervention on the quality of life, function and treatment-related side effects following breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2012
- Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for people with cancer during active treatmentEmergencias, 2012
- Effects of self‐directed stress management training and home‐based exercise on quality of life in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trialPsycho‐Oncology, 2012
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Home-Based Exercise for Cancer-Related Fatigue in Women During and After Chemotherapy With or Without Radiation TherapyCancer Nursing, 2010
- Improving sleep quality for cancer patients: benefits of a home-based exercise interventionSupportive Care in Cancer, 2009
- Effect of a multimodal high intensity exercise intervention in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2009
- Impact of a walking intervention on cardiorespiratory fitness, self‐reported physical function, and pain in patients undergoing treatment for solid tumorsCancer, 2009
- A Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Causal Effect of a Treatment in Randomized Clinical Trials Subject to NoncomplianceBiometrics, 2009
- Benefits of supervised group exercise programme for women being treated for early stage breast cancer: pragmatic randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2007
- Exercise manages fatigue during breast cancer treatment: A randomized controlled trialPsycho‐Oncology, 2004