Spasticity outcome measures in spinal cord injury: psychometric properties and clinical utility
Open Access
- 2 October 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Spinal Cord
- Vol. 46 (2), 86-95
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102125
Abstract
Comprehensive review and systematic analyses. Assess published psychometric evidence for spinal cord injury (SCI) spasticity outcome measures. Considerations about the influence of spasticity on function have also been identified to understand treatment effects and guide service delivery. London, Ontario and Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Review of measures was based on availability of psychometric data, application in clinical settings and evaluated in SCI patients. Ashworth and Modified Ashworth Scales (AS, MAS), Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS), Spinal Cord Assessment Tool for Spasticity (SCATS), Visual Analogue Scale self-rated scale of spasticity (VAS) and the Wartenberg Pendulum Test (WPT) were included in this review. The most frequently used tools for SCI spasticity measurement include the AS, MAS, PSFS and VAS, of which the latter two are self-report spasticity measures. The SCATS has been partially validated for SCI, but is not widely used. The WPT has been minimally validated despite its use in a large-scale SCI spasticity randomized controlled trial. Since spasticity is multidimensional, focusing on one or two spasticity outcome measures can misrepresent the extent and influence of spasticity on SCI patients. Different scales measure different aspects of spasticity and individual tools correlate weakly with each other. Spasticity may be better measured with an appropriate battery of tests, including the AS or MAS, along with PSFS. These tools would benefit from further reliability and responsiveness testing. Tools that assess the influence of spasticity on patient activities, participation and quality of life are important, but lacking.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of Spinal Cord Injury Spasticity in Clinical TrialsTopics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 2006
- Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Baclofen in Spasticity:American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2005
- Functional outcome of intrathecal baclofen administration for severe spasticityClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2005
- The short-term effect of hippotherapy on spasticity in patients with spinal cord injurySpinal Cord, 2003
- Secondary Impairments After Spinal Cord InjuryAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2000
- The inter rater reliability of the original and of the modified Ashworth scale for the assessment of spasticity in patients with spinal cord injurySpinal Cord, 1996
- The Stockholm Spinal Cord Injury Study: 2. Associations between clinical patient characteristics and post-acute medical problemsSpinal Cord, 1995
- The Stockholm spinal cord injury study: 1. Medical problems in a regional SCI populationSpinal Cord, 1995
- A double-blind study of L-threonine in patients with spinal spasticityActa Neurologica Scandinavica, 1993
- Intrathecal Baclofen for Severe Spinal SpasticityThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1989