Value of symptoms and additional diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis
Open Access
- 31 March 2010
- Vol. 340 (mar31 3), c1269
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1269
Abstract
Objective To summarise available evidence on diagnostic tests that might help primary care physicians to identify patients with an increased risk for colorectal cancer among those consulting for non-acute lower abdominal symptoms. Data sources PubMed, Embase, and reference screening. Study eligibility criteria Studies were selected if the design was a diagnostic study; the patients were adults consulting because of non-acute lower abdominal symptoms; tests included signs, symptoms, blood tests, or faecal tests. Study appraisal and synthesis methods Two reviewers independently assessed quality with a modified version of the QUADAS tool and extracted data. We present diagnostic two by two tables and pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. We refrained from pooling when there was considerable clinical or statistical heterogeneity. Results 47 primary diagnostic studies were included. Sensitivity was consistently high for age ≥50 (range 0.81-0.96, median 0.91), a referral guideline (0.80-0.94, 0.92), and immunochemical faeces tests (0.70-1.00, 0.95). Of these, only specificity of the faeces tests was good. Specificity was consistently high for family history (0.75-0.98, 0.91), weight loss (0.72-0.96, 0.89), and iron deficiency anaemia (0.83-0.95, 0.92), but all tests lacked sensitivity. None of these six tests was (sufficiently) studied in primary care. Conclusions Although combinations of symptom and results of immunochemical faeces tests showed good diagnostic performance for colorectal cancer, evidence from primary care is lacking. High quality studies on their role in the diagnostic investigation of colorectal cancer in primary care are urgently needed.This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- Classic “Outlet” Rectal Bleeding does not Require Full Colonoscopy to Exclude Significant PathologyDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2008
- As tests evolve and costs of cancer care rise: reappraising stool‐based screening for colorectal neoplasiaAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2008
- Predictive value of common symptom combinations in diagnosing colorectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2007
- Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006Annals of Oncology, 2007
- Prioritization of colorectal referrals: a review of the 2‐week wait referral systemColorectal Disease, 2006
- ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillanceGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2006
- The yield of lower endoscopy in patients with constipation: Survey of a university hospital, a public county hospital, and a Veterans Administration medical centerGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2002
- Comparison of coloscreen self-test® and Haemoccult® faecal occult blood tests in the detection of colorectal cancer in symptomatic patientsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1990
- Negative Haemoccult®Test in Malignant and Premalignant Lesions of the ColonEndoscopy, 1989
- An assessment of occult blood testing to determine which patients with large bowel symptoms require urgent investigationBritish Journal of Surgery, 1985