Direct adhesive materials: current perceptions and evidence—future solutions
- 31 July 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Dentistry
- Vol. 29 (5), 307-316
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(01)00021-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dyract versus Tytin Class II Restorations in Primary Molars: 36 Months EvaluationCaries Research, 1999
- A preliminary study of the effect of glass-ionomer and related dental cements on the pH of lactic acid storage solutionsBiomaterials, 1999
- Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.Journal of Dental Research, 1997
- Intra‐oral distribution and impact of caries experience among South Australian school childrenAustralian Dental Journal, 1996
- Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn'tBMJ, 1996
- Survey of continuing dental education attendance in Western AustraliaAustralian Dental Journal, 1992
- Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement: a five-year clinical studyAustralian Dental Journal, 1991
- The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restorationBritish Dental Journal, 1991
- The fate and survival of amalgam and preformed crown molar restorations placed in a specialist paediatric dental practiceBritish Dental Journal, 1990
- Root surface caries: a recurrent dilemma*Australian Dental Journal, 1986