Under-estimation of obesity, hypertension and high cholesterol by self-reported data: comparison of self-reported information and objective measures from health examination surveys
Open Access
- 6 June 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 24 (6), 941-948
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku074
Abstract
Background: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) cause 63% of deaths worldwide. The leading NCD risk factor is raised blood pressure, contributing to 13% of deaths. A large proportion of NCDs are preventable by modifying risk factor levels. Effective prevention programmes and health policy decisions need to be evidence based. Currently, self-reported information in general populations or data from patients receiving healthcare provides the best available information on the prevalence of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, etc. in most countries. Methods: In the European Health Examination Survey Pilot Project, 12 countries conducted a pilot survey among the working-age population. Information was collected using standardized questionnaires, physical measurement and blood sampling protocols. This allowed comparison of self-reported and measured data on prevalence of overweight, obesity, hypertension, high blood cholesterol and diabetes. Results: Self-reported data under-estimated population means and prevalence for health indicators assessed. The self-reported data provided prevalence of obesity four percentage points lower for both men and women. For hypertension, the self-reported prevalence was 10 percentage points lower, only in men. For elevated total cholesterol, the difference was 50 percentage point among men and 44 percentage points among women. For diabetes, again only in men, the self-reported prevalence was 1 percentage point lower than measured. With self-reported data only, almost 70% of population at risk of elevated total cholesterol is missed compared with data from objective measurements. Conclusions: Health indicators based on measurements in the general population include undiagnosed cases, therefore providing more accurate surveillance data than reliance on self-reported or healthcare-based information only.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Temporal trends in misclassification patterns of measured and self-report based body mass index categories - findings from three population surveys in IrelandBMC Public Health, 2010
- Comparing self‐reported and measured high blood pressure and high cholesterol status using data from a large representative cohort studyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2010
- Validez del diagnóstico referido de diabetes, hipertensión e hiperlipemia en población adulta española. Resultados del estudio DINORevista Espanola de Cardiologia, 2009
- No evidence for marked ethnic differences in accuracy of self-reported diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemiaJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2007
- Comparison of routine care self-reported and biometrical data on hypertension and diabetes: results of the Utrecht Health ProjectEuropean Journal of Public Health, 2006
- Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failureJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004
- Validation of self-reported chronic conditions and health services in a managed care populationAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2000
- Validity of cardiovascular disease risk factors assessed by telephone survey: The behavioral risk factor surveyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Reliability and validity of interview data on chronic diseases The mini-Finland health surveyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- AGREEMENT BETWEEN QUESTIONNAIRE DATA AND MEDICAL RECORDSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1989