Electrocardiographic Motion Artifact Versus Electrode Impedance
- 20 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Vol. 52 (1), 136-139
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2004.836503
Abstract
We degraded electrocardiographic electrodes by exposing them to air for four days and evaluated them on 12 subjects. After application, we recorded the electrocardiogram (including motion artifact), missed QRS detections and electrode impedance during 5 min of arm and body movements. Missed QRS detections increased with electrode impedance but correlation was poor. Increased electrode impedance was not a reliable predictor of a poor electrode and the need to replace it.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of methods for adaptive removal of motion artifactPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2002
- Adaptive reduction of motion artifact in the electrocardiogramPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2002
- The origin of skin-stretch-caused motion artifacts under electrodesPhysiological Measurement, 1996
- Reducing Motion Artifacts and Interference in Biopotential RecordingIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1984
- Movement-induced potentials in surface electrodesMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 1982
- Minimizing Electrode Motion Artifact by Skin AbrasionIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1977
- Triboelectric Interference in the ECGIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1975