Nonintubated Surfactant Application vs Conventional Therapy in Extremely Preterm Infants
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Pediatrics
- Vol. 169 (8), 723-730
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0504
Abstract
Research from JAMA Pediatrics — Nonintubated Surfactant Application vs Conventional Therapy in Extremely Preterm Infants — A Randomized Clinical TrialThis publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Extremely Preterm Infants: Impact on Mortality and MorbidityNeonatology, 2013
- Randomized Trial of Early Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Very Low Birth Weight InfantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2012
- Minimally-invasive surfactant therapy in preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressureArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 2012
- Avoidance of mechanical ventilation by surfactant treatment of spontaneously breathing preterm infants (AMV): an open-label, randomised, controlled trialThe Lancet, 2011
- Predictors of early nasal CPAP failure and effects of various intubation criteria on the rate of mechanical ventilation in preterm infants of <29 weeks gestational ageArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 2011
- Early CPAP versus Surfactant in Extremely Preterm InfantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Surfactant without Intubation in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: First Multi-center DataKlinische Padiatrie, 2010
- Nasal CPAP or Intubation at Birth for Very Preterm InfantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Summary Proceedings From the Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia GroupPediatrics, 2006
- Manual Ventilation with a Few Large Breaths at Birth Compromises the Therapeutic Effect of Subsequent Surfactant Replacement in Immature LambsPediatric Research, 1997