Direct versus indirect comparisons: A summary of the evidence
- 9 April 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 24 (02), 170-177
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462308080240
Abstract
The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive summary and interpretation of the current evidence on the use and validity of statistical methods to conduct indirect comparisons of treatment effects. A narrative review was conducted. Well-conducted methodological studies provide good evidence that adjusted indirect comparisons can lead to results similar to those from direct comparisons. The internal validity of several statistical methods to conduct indirect comparisons, therefore, has been established. Meta-regression, logistic regression, or adjusted indirect comparisons should be the methods of first choice. Unadjusted indirect comparisons are always unacceptable. Deciding whether to combine direct and indirect evidence will be a matter of informed judgment based on the similarities and dissimilarities of populations and interventions. Unverifiable assumptions with respect to the similarity of compared studies and low power are serious limitations of indirect comparisons. In the absence of sufficient head-to-head evidence, adjusted indirect comparisons can be viewed as additional analytical tools to determine the comparative efficacy and effectiveness of competing interventions. Researchers who use indirect comparisons need to keep the limitations in mind.This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- A double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of venlafaxine and fluoxetine treatment in depressed outpatientsJournal of Psychiatric Research, 2007
- Indirect comparisons: the mesh and mess of clinical trialsThe Lancet, 2006
- Randomized Trial of Sertraline Versus Venlafaxine XR in Major DepressionThe Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 2005
- Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidenceBMJ, 2005
- Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisonsStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- An 8-Week Multicenter, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Sertraline in Elderly Outpatients With Major DepressionAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2003
- Once-Daily Venlafaxine Extended Release (XR) Compared With Fluoxetine in Outpatients With Depression and AnxietyThe Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 1999
- Clinical and Economic Comparison of Sertraline and Fluoxetine in the Treatment of DepressionPharmacoEconomics, 1998
- Efficacy and Tolerability of Once-Daily Venlafaxine Extended Release (XR) in Outpatients With Major DepressionThe Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 1997
- A controlled comparison of sertraline and fluoxetine in acute and continuation treatment of major depressionHuman Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 1995