Commodification and contradiction in academic research
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies
- Vol. 4 (2), 263-278
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10245289808523515
Abstract
Despite the growing interest in participatory research forms and collaboration around community action, and social justice-oriented public service, academics in the U.S. are caught in a dilemma. While U.S. academics increasingly desire to work in community and participatory work, they face contradictions in the form of institution of higher education reward systems, merit pay structures, and promotions and tenure requirements tied to a system of science which fosters the classification of knowledge as a product, or commodity. Commodification pressures cannot be entirely eliminated, but five resistance strategies for faculty members are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Academic Communit and Post-Tenure ReviewAcademe, 1997
- Divided No MoreChange: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 1992
- Funding Head Start: What are the issues?American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1992
- Are Head Start Effects Sustained? A Longitudinal Follow-Up Comparison of Disadvantaged Children Attending Head Start, No Preschool, and Other Preschool ProgramsChild Development, 1990
- Head Start Enters AdulthoodScience, 1990
- Sociocultural Assumptions of Federally Sponsored Follow Through ProgramsThe Journal of Psychology, 1987
- Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft placeInterchange, 1986
- Assessing Head Start at 20: An invited commentary.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1985
- Referent Organizations and the Development of Inter-Organizational DomainsHuman Relations, 1983
- "Nice Girl": Social Control of Women through a Value ConstructSigns: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1977