Abstract
The aircraft industry, as a whole, is striving to limit its impact on the environment. Improved engine design and operation may offer a reduction in emissions of a few percent. More efficient air traffic control (ATC) may offer a limited reduction in overall fuel burn. Improvements in aerodynamic design and materials available (e.g. on A350XWB, B787) might achieve a few percent increases in efficiencies. The use of alternative fuels is some way off. The ACARE objectives present a stiff challenge.Our recent studies have shown that air-to-air-refuelling (AAR), well established in military circles, introduced to civil aircraft operations would provide fuel savings of the order of 30% – 40%. AAR will allow smaller (3,000nm range), more efficient (greener) aircraft, operating from shorter runways, to fulfil long-range route requirements. In addition, the ‘safety-net’ afforded by the availability of AAR will enable a host of hitherto borderline technologies to be accepted and utilised in future aircraft designs. Laminar flow will provide fuel savings and increased efficiency in its own right provided it is enabled within a civil AAR environment. Similarly, supersonic transport becomes an acceptable economic option.

This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit: