Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-L1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis
Open Access
- 10 September 2018
- Vol. 362, k3529
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3529
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the relative efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors versus conventional drugs in patients with cancer that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. Design Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and conference abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology up to March 2018. Review methods Studies of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) that had available hazard ratios for death based on PD-L1 positivity or negativity were included. The threshold for PD-L1 positivity or negativity was that PD-L1 stained cell accounted for 1% of tumour cells, or tumour and immune cells, assayed by immunohistochemistry staining methods. Results 4174 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers from eight randomised controlled trials were included in this study. Compared with conventional agents, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with significantly prolonged overall survival in both patients that were PD-L1 positive (n=2254, hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.74) and PD-L1 negative (1920, 0.80, 0.71 to 0.90). However, the efficacies of PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade treatment in patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative were significantly different (P=0.02 for interaction). Additionally, in both patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative, the long term clinical benefits from PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade were observed consistently across interventional agent, cancer histotype, method of randomisation stratification, type of immunohistochemical scoring system, drug target, type of control group, and median follow-up time. Conclusions PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy is a preferable treatment option over conventional therapy for both patients that are PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. This finding suggests that PD-L1 expression status alone is insufficient in determining which patients should be offered PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy.This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Nivolumab in Previously Untreated Melanoma withoutBRAFMutationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistanceNature, 2014
- Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironmentNature Immunology, 2013
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next GenerationCell, 2011
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine, 2009
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003