A Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Procainamide Versus Propafenone Versus Amiodarone for the Conversion of Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation
- 15 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 99 (12), 1721-1725
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.059
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management of Newly Detected Atrial Fibrillation: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of PhysiciansAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Amiodarone for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillationInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2003
- Old and new antiarrhythmic drugs for converting and maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: comparative efficacy and results of trialsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2003
- Comparison of oral loading dose of propafenone and amiodarone for converting recent-onset atrial fibrillationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1999
- Management of Patients With Atrial FibrillationCirculation, 1996
- Comparative mechanisms of antiarrhythmic drug action in experimental atrial fibrillation. Importance of use-dependent effects on refractoriness.Circulation, 1993
- Management of Atrial FibrillationThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Electropharmacology of amiodarone therapy initiation. Time courses of onset of electrophysiologic and antiarrhythmic effects.Circulation, 1989
- Digoxin for Converting Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation to Sinus RhythmAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- Conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm by acute intravenous procainamide infusionAmerican Heart Journal, 1983