Crop residue harvest for bioenergy production and its implications on soil functioning and plant growth: A review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 May 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by FapUNIFESP (SciELO) in Scientia Agricola
- Vol. 75 (3), 255-272
- https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0459
Abstract
The use of crop residues as a bioenergy feedstock is considered a potential strategy to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, indiscriminate harvesting of crop residues can induce deleterious effects on soil functioning, plant growth and other ecosystem services. Here, we have summarized the information available in the literature to identify and discuss the main trade-offs and synergisms involved in crop residue management for bioenergy production. The data consistently showed that crop residue harvest and the consequent lower input of organic matter into the soil led to C storage depletions over time, reducing cycling, supply and availability of soil nutrients, directly affecting the soil biota. Although the biota regulates key functions in the soil, crop residue can also cause proliferation of some important agricultural pests. In addition, crop residues act as physical barriers that protect the soil against raindrop impact and temperature variations. Therefore, intensive crop residue harvest can cause soil structure degradation, leading to soil compaction and increased risks of erosion. With regard to GHG emissions, there is no consensus about the potential impact of management of crop residue harvest. In general, residue harvest decreases CO2 and N2O emissions from the decomposition process, but it has no significant effect on CH4 emissions. Plant growth responses to soil and microclimate changes due to crop residue harvest are site and crop specific. Adoption of the best management practices can mitigate the adverse impacts of crop residue harvest. Longterm experiments within strategic production regions are essential to understand and monitor the impact of integrated agricultural systems and propose customized solutions for sustainable crop residue management in each region or landscape. Furthermore, private and public investments/cooperations are necessary for a better understanding of the potential environmental, economic and social implications of crop residue use for bioenergy production.Keywords
This publication has 137 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Sugarcane Burning or Green Harvest Methods on the Brazilian Cerrado Soil Bacterial Community StructurePLOS ONE, 2013
- Straw coverage alleviates seasonal variability of the topsoil microbial biomass and activityCATENA, 2011
- Carbon stock and its compartments in a subtropical oxisol under long-term tillage and crop rotation systemsRevista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 2011
- Eucalypt plantation effects on organic carbon and aggregation of three different-textured soils in BrazilSoil Research, 2011
- Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in BrazilProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- Soil carbon stocks under burned and unburned sugarcane in BrazilGeoderma, 2009
- Production and carbon allocation in a clonal Eucalyptus plantation with water and nutrient manipulationsForest Ecology and Management, 2008
- Soil organic carbon dynamics following afforestation of degraded pastures with eucalyptus in southeastern BrazilForest Ecology and Management, 2006
- Residue management effects on soil carbon and nutrient contents and growth of second rotation eucalyptsForest Ecology and Management, 2003
- Change in soil carbon following afforestationForest Ecology and Management, 2002