Measuring Group Efficacy in Virtual Teams
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Small Group Research
- Vol. 37 (1), 65-85
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405284219
Abstract
Group efficacy has received renewed attention in the group literature. Although the relationship between group efficacy and group performance is well established, debate continues on how best to measure the construct. Although most research has explored this issue using collocated groups, this article examines the measurement of group efficacy in virtual teams and explores why some measurement methods may be more appropriate for use in noncollocated groups. Fifty-three senior-level university students involved in virtual team projects were administered questionnaires over the course of their project. As theorized, data analyses revealed that group efficacy beliefs reached by consensus were significantly higher than those measured by surveys administered to individual virtual team members. In addition, support for the greater predictability of an aggregated method over a group consensus method was demonstrated. Follow-up analyses show that group outcome perceptions were significantly related to team performance. Implications and future research are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Further Understanding of Trust and Performance in Virtual TeamsSmall Group Research, 2003
- Group Potency and Collective EfficacyGroup & Organization Management, 2003
- The Development of Collective Efficacy in Small Task GroupsSmall Group Research, 2001
- Understanding Group EfficacyGroup & Organization Management, 2000
- Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of AppropriationInformation Systems Research, 1997
- The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support SystemsSmall Group Research, 1993
- Potency in groups: Articulating a constructBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1993
- Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated GroupsManagement Science, 1990
- Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information SystemsMIS Quarterly, 1987
- Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984