Audiolingual Method and Behaviorism: From Misunderstanding to Myth
- 1 September 2006
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Applied Linguistics
- Vol. 27 (3), 519-526
- https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml023
Abstract
This article contends that the modern descendant of B. F. Skinner's experimental analysis of behavior, ‘behavior analysis,’ and as well his 1957 masterwork Verbal Behavior, have rarely if ever been seriously contemplated by applied linguists for possible contributions to the field. Rather, a pat literature of dismissal has developed that justifies itself on (a) a fictitious link between the audiolingual method and undifferentiated behaviorism, and/or (b) a demonstrably erroneous notion that operant psychology is too simplistic to effectively take up language issues. In reality, behavior analysis is alive, well, and making significant contributions in applied language settings, but not typically in the second language area.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- IMPLICATIONS AND REFINEMENTS OF THE ESTABLISHING OPERATION CONCEPTJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2000
- Establishing OperationsThe Behavior Analyst, 1993
- Verbal Behavior: The other reviewsThe Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 1992
- Skinner and Chomsky thirty years laterNew Approaches To the Study of Later Modern English, 1990
- On the relation between radical behaviorism and the science of verbal behaviorThe Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 1989
- Establishing operations and the mandThe Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 1988
- CRITICISM AND RESPONSE IN THE SKINNER CONTROVERSIESJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1988
- Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operationsThe Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 1987
- DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN DISCRIMINATIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL FUNCTIONS OF STIMULIJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1982
- ON CHOMSKY'S REVIEW OF SKINNER'S VERBAL BEHAVIORJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970